My Huawei phone arrived

Sunday out to meet an old friend at a restaurant in Beijing while navigating my iPhone suddenly died in the cold and couldn’t turn on for a while. Only five minutes it went on at 10% battery when before it was at 70%.

So I thought time to order a Chinese phone instead. Sunday night I did so online on JD 京东 and today at noon it was delivered. I spent only 1000 RMB (less than $200) on it. Let’s see how long it lasts being so much cheaper. I ordered a cheap one after my physics professor friend in China told me he never goes beyond 1000 RMB when ordering his Huawei phones. There were Huawei ones that are like 4000 RMB iirc.

For those of you still stuck in America who can’t return in the near future who want to support China in this trade war you can start by using Xiaomi for phone and boycotting Google and Facebook. Americans go out of their way to devalue Chinese companies and there is every reason for Chinese to do the same to America in return.

Apparently, another one of Ren Zhengfei’s daughters is a computer science undergraduate at Harvard

The detaining of Meng Wanzhou, CFO of Huawei and daughter of its founder Ren Zhengfei, at Canadian airport on behest of the US authorities has made headlines the past several days. On that, I have little to say other than that she is quite attractive and also that the half-closeted nepotism via mother’s surname is both amusing and somewhat gross.

Reading her Wikipedia page, I pulled the following

Ren’s first wife was Meng Jun, the daughter of Meng Dongbo, a former deputy governor of Sichuan Province. They had two children: daughter Meng Wanzhou and son Meng Ping, both of whom took up their mother’s surname.[14] After their divorce, he married Yao Ling, with whom he had another daughter, Annabel Yao, who is 25 years younger than Meng Wanzhou. Annabel is a computer science student at Harvard University who made a high-profile debut at Le Bal des Débutantes in Paris in 2018.[14] Ren married for the third time to Su Wei, who was reportedly his former secretary.[14]

Ren’s eldest daughter, Meng Wanzhou, is deputy chairperson and chief financial officer (CFO) of Huawei.[15]

I’m somewhat surprised and also rather disappointed that Ren Zhengfei sent his other daughter, who also took her mother’s surname (and this is a different mother), to Harvard for undergrad. It reminds of how Xi Jinping’s daughter transferred to Harvard from Zhejiang University after her freshman year. I hate to say it but it’ll be hard to take the PRC elites too seriously when they send their children to elite US schools for undergrad. It is a sign that they still lack independence with a need to associate with global homo Anglo elite institutions. On the Chinese internet, people are questioning what other passports besides the Chinese one is possessed by Meng Wanzhou, and it was revealed somewhere that she had a green card from Canada.

Meng for undergraduate merely attended a good but not great university in China. That was when her father, who started Huawei in his 40s, was still a relative nobody. Remember that in China, aside from regional discrimination, wherein Beijing residents are allocated like 10 times more slots at Beida/Qinghua adjusted for population than residents in the provinces, admissions is based purely on gaokao and automatic admission via top performance on the national math and science olympiads. It’s basically impossible for filthy rich and/or well-connected parents to buy one’s kid’s way into Beida/Qinghua in China. So I guess when the kid of someone super high up in China turns out to be intellectually mediocre, attending an elite US school for undergrad becomes the default, sadly.

Something to note, relatedly, is that 富二代 (second generation rich) is a relatively new phenomenon in China. After all, after the communists took power, the rich people had their assets confiscated (like my amusingly pro-communist ABC friend stuck in the US at least for the near future, his family ended up sharing their four story house/building with a bunch of a poor people), and afterwards, people in high up positions did not make much more than the ordinary worker, with the salary difference, based on what I’ve heard, at most a factor of 10, barring very exceptional cases. It was really only after 1980 when it became possible for one to become extremely rich doing business. Between 1980 and 2010. there was a lot of low hanging fruit in China, economically. Plenty of mediocre people with the right entrepreneurial energy/personality became rich. And by that, the class of second generation rich was born, and it seems now they are forming their own culture, with studying abroad paying ridiculous tuition at US universities common, as well as their parents investing in US real estate. It’s very possible and perhaps likely that the class structure in China will solidify over the next generation, as is already the case in the US. How much so, that remains to be seen.

I’ve had some interactions with 富二代 kids and their parents in the US. Many of them are, predictably, not very smart academically. They are basically on permanent vacation in America. Their career/employment prospects in America are not surely not good for obvious reasons. It doesn’t seem like they’re well treated in school by their white peers in America. Yes, their families are economically well off, but that doesn’t mean they can integrate into American society. Their families are able to invest in real estate in America for now; even so, their existence in the US will be a marginal one much confined to the Chinese community. Many of them do not even know English well and are mostly here to invest in real estate, enjoy some material comfort and fresh air, and also send their kids to school here. In most cases, the father based in China only visits every once in a while. They’re obviously not really wanted in America other than for their money, spent on international tuition and luxury brands and so on.

As the reader can tell, I don’t have a high opinion of those 富二代 who send their kids to America and invest in real estate there. Being in China now, I’m sure I’ll learn more about them, including the process they go through to transfer all that money to the US, and maybe I can even influence them a bit. As one can see from the detention of Meng Wanzhou in Canada, there is little guarantee for them on US soil. Finance/economics tells us there is no such thing as a free lunch. They may feel they are winning now and that their assets in America are safe, but this could very much be a process of 温水煮青蛙 (a frog boiled in warm water), where initially one feels warmth, until one gets burned. They may own real estate in America on paper for now, but that real estate is physically in America, where the Chinese do not really control anything. They have no media power, no legal power, no military power there. It’s totally possible for them to suddenly lose everything. Unlikely, but it can happen and only needs to happen once.

The Meng Wanzhou incident has been in Chinese media tied to the death of Stanford physics professor Shoucheng Zhang at age 55 which happened on the same day. The family statement said that it was due to depression, which we all know is just a euphemism. There has been speculation that it was related to the alleged tanking of his Chinese venture capital firm in Silicon Valley. It’s quite tragic that he took his ambition/careerism too far, assuming that his death was related to his VC activity. Had he just remained purely academic, he would have survived and likely eventually won his Nobel. Needless to say, using the prestige of a rare Stanford tenured professorship in physics to raise a Chinese VC is not really what he should be doing while officially in that position. Stanford probably should be somewhat embarrassed about his case as well, in addition to the recent Elizabeth Holmes case that was magnitudes worse. On this, I also have in mind the cases of Lucas Duplan and Evan Spiegel, both quite shameful.

It is my hope that talented, elite Chinese can focus more on developing their institutions at home instead of wasting so much money and energy associating with and working for elite US institutions for signaling. Doing so only inflates the value of a system hostile to Chinese while at the same time de-valuing Chinese institutions. If Chinese are really serious about this trade war, they should be going out of their way to devalue Harvard and Stanford, to devalue Google and Facebook, not eagerly trying to attend those schools for undergrad for a rather mediocre academic educational experience and making such a big deal about working for those companies, whose programmers are generally no better than ones in a good internet company in China as far as I can tell. If Chinese want other people to respect and value them, then they ought to first have confidence in their own institutions. I say this having been in prestigious US institutions myself, interacted substantially with numerous people from there, and frankly, many of them are not all that great, with some depressingly mediocre or even problematic. Of course, there are also plenty of genuinely brilliant, accomplished people in America in top American institutions. Overall, my point is that it’s clear that America will not judge the Chinese well, so why expend so much trying to associate and fit in with America? Why not instead expend more energy into creating a system where what America thinks simply becomes more or less irrelevant?

 

张首晟的去世

周四,我认识的一位同样搞理论凝聚态物理的人微信发给我了张首晟去世的消息,让我感到吃惊。这么牛逼的人,不光有资格得诺贝尔奖的理论物理学家,而且还很有钱,好像他90年代末凭他斯坦福大学教授的关系做了搞虚拟机器(virtual machine)的VMware(其创始人是斯坦福大学计算机系教授)的天使投资,赚了一大笔钱,也得到了为后来做风险投资的资历和关系。一流理论物理学家很少是多么有钱的,美国名校物理教授每年也就15万,最多30万的工资(当然,现在极少数最牛的理论物理学家可以通过什么突破奖发点大财了),而张首晟成为了极其罕见的即大物理学家又大发财的人,一种几乎不存在的令人惊叹不已的人生赢家。可惜他近年做得过度了,最终出现了悲剧。可以说他当初运气太好了,拿到的教职确是斯坦福的,才得到了这种天使投资的机会。反而他要是是什么麻省理工或哈弗的,很难想象到他这么去做。可是,反过来,也可以说最终好事变成了坏事,他的这种运气所迎来的成功引发了他后来自以为是的做一件物理教授不应该做的事情而运气不好彻底倒闭了,英年夭折失去了得诺贝尔奖的机会。

记得2015年底,我在湾区餐馆跟朋友吃饭看到了张首晟在另一个桌子和他老婆和有一对夫妇一起吃饭谈话,当时,我已经知道他是非常有名气的斯坦福理论物理学家了。可能那时候我也知道他搞丹华资本这件事情了,感觉是他在利用斯坦福大学物理教授的威望为中国人在硅谷争取一些地位,不光要当大物理学家,还要当什么民族领袖,民族英雄。当然,我也意识到他拿着美国名校的终身教职来为中国人搞VC真的不是他应该做的事情,会引起别人对他的不满,不过他在那种位置,别人也不能把他怎么样。不过,一些主流的白人VC若对他有仇,我想还真的能让他的风险投资商难以持续。我认识的那位与张首晟稍有过接触那位物理学家是说在风险投资界他根本不算啥,老美根本不会买他的帐,只有中国人会因为他的位置听他忽悠。比如,我在美国认识一位斯坦福大学的本科生,女生,也是学物理的,她跟我说她妈妈还会参加一些湾区张首晟讲VC的活动。那个人也说他的VC的钱也没有那么多,也就四亿,输一次就基本输光了,下面的图来自方舟子。

DtzCC49UUAAAC-Y

如那个人所描述,输光了给他融资的人就要找他打官司了,而且会揭露他的一些非法的操作,就是不自杀也得坐牢了。

我还记得有一次网上看到了他的一个视频,是在斯坦福大学举行的那种启发美国华裔中学生那种活动,网上可以搜到,那里边他讲了他的一些人生故事和价值观。记得一开始他说起他长大的文革时期中国的气候是不鼓励学习的,然后又说起他父母是工程师,然后家人有好多学过文科的人,自己小时候多么多么善于自己读书学习。然后还开始扯美国建国的人如Benjamin Franklin, John Adams的一些理念,说什么我自己要做一些实用的挣钱的事情,为了我的孩子或孙子能够从事更创造性的如艺术之类的工作。他说同样,我们这一代移民来到美国好多为了留下,为了挣钱,却选择了工程,他属于少数坚持他对理论物理热爱的人,但第二代就比他们有远远更好的条件,应该去追求自己的梦想,最自己喜欢的东西。他说的这些也有一定道理了,当然,他扯美国建国人的时候我有点感到不舒服,我想他是不是觉得自己在美国名校斯坦福举行这种明目张胆的华人利益活动有点不要脸了,他真的觉得中国人应该学习美国建国人那套吗,以白人至上主义和暴力逐出印第安土著人建设一个华人没有什么真正地位的国家吗?他跟那些孩子讲完了之后,在旧金山的中国领事馆的一个代表又开始采访他了。在那一段谈话里,我记得他说中国人在美国都混得不错,大多是在做工程。是,那些科技移民在硅谷都有比较好的工程工作,整一个相当高的工资,不过相当少能成为经理,很少能够创办自己的公司,也没有那么好,在美国依然算相对边缘。还记得他又提到自己的儿子在哈弗上学第一学期在上一门中国近代历史的课,不过都是用英文以美国的眼光讲,同时儿子中文也不错,也读了陈独秀的一些中文文集。我想这活动肯定是那儿的中国领事馆组织的,由于张首晟当时是拿了政府的钱本科时去德国留学的,中国政府的人依然觉得有资格“利用”他一下。

我还想说张首晟和他孩子都是虔诚的基督教徒,我也看到他的孩子对他们的基督教信仰还都比较公开,甚至到有点痴迷的程度。这种在美国华人里,据我所知,还是少见的,这种科学人及基督信仰混合在白人里我看到不少例子,华人这样却让我感到有点不对劲儿,至少感觉有点奇怪。我想这样做在中国会得到一定的排斥,毕竟太逆行于主流,尤其解放后,看到为此,方舟子也对张首晟表示了不满。同样,我认识的那位物理学家觉得基督徒的张首晟搞这种投机收利息的行为是比较讽刺的。

最后,为这位伟大的华人物理学家的不幸而逝默哀。他无法得诺贝尔奖真的是可惜了,我想好多中国人会为此感到遗憾。历史给予他什么样的地位,只有时间会告诉我们。

A girl from China studying abroad in America being mistreated by a Jewish landlord, consulting me

I’m translating this from original Chinese, published here on Zhihu.

Basically the landlord keeps blaming problems in the home on her and is demanding more even after having deducted out her entire deposit and is taking advantage of her because she’s a college student from China.

My response to her was that the most her landlord can do is not give back any of her deposit, and why give any more money if the deposit is already fully deducted away, even if you just leave, he can don’t anything to you, of course, renting another place isn’t only trouble, you’ll have to pay another deposit, if you refuse to pay anything beyond the deposit, he can’t do anything to you, even if he blames stuff on you and incurs on you additional charges, you just refuse no matter what, if he take it further and finds a collective agency to demand your money, once you’re back in China, you’re basically under zero risk.

Afterwards, I told her that in America, Jews have pretty much controlled the finance, media, and legal sectors, arguably the three sectors most critical towards political power, and so very few people dare offend the Jews, and often only suffer in silence in the face of mistreatment, with even whites submitting to Jews. The positive side is that once she returns to China, she can not give a damn about what Jews think. I even told her that once she gets her degree, she can tell the landlord that after she returns to China, she will do everything she can to smear the Jewish reputation there, encourage Chinese and the Chinese government to boycott any company run by Jews, and this way, the landlord will not dare to mistreat Chinese tenants too much, because China can really make life difficult for Jews and Israel.

I suggest the Chinese in America, if able to, to stay away from Jewish bosses and Jewish landlords, and do what they can to devalue any company or institution controlled by Jews, starting from little things, like not using Gmail, not using Facebook, even if studying abroad in America, one can still use a Chinese email, not give a damn about whether American will regard you as not “democratic” enough. Towards Jews, learn to exert whatever pressure on them that you can. I also told that person to get something from something else, the most effective way is to have something that poses a real threat to them, and make them aware of it, as opposed to being polite and submissive, as in most case, being polite and submissive, especially towards people like Jews, will only make one seem meek and easy to take advantage of.

In America, Chinese are legally basically visibly second class citizens, because Chinese there don’t have any political power or influence, so the law will always be visibly disadvantaged Chinese, with even Chinese scapegoated for industrial/technology espionage on trumped up charges, there are several cases of such every year entering the mainstream media. In contrast, Jews are the most legally protected group in America.

The most unfortunate are those second generation Chinese in America who do not know the Chinese language and are unable to benefit from China, who can only be a passive minority in America ripe for exploitation. Like that person I consulted, she is a Chinese international student, even if she doesn’t do well in America, she can still go back to China to develop her career, and everything that happened in America can basically be erased, and at the same time, she can influence public opinion in China a large market, advantages not possessed by second generation Chinese American, for which there are exceptions, like myself, assuming the reader views me as a second generation Chinese American.

Really, in the final analysis, I feel like going to America for college self-funded is a rather unwise decision, of course not saying that there aren’t exceptional cases. If you want to go, go for graduate school, get into a PhD program in STEM where you can get a very small salary/stipend, as opposed to giving money to American institutions. Honestly, lots of those who study abroad in America, especially those not in STEM, are basically on a permanent vacation there, especially if they go in middle school, if you’re not of value to them, there won’t be a job, and they only let you be there for your money, either your family has money and can support you, or you should accumulate knowledge, skills, and connection that would help you develop a career in China.

Now China is quite powerful, and should when able to have the world adapt to China, as opposed to adapt to a world centered on America in a compliant fashion. Learn appropriately some methods of the Jews, you see, Jews in America never really adapt to and tolerate others, they also try to find a way to have other adapts to themselves, if somebody else does anything against the Jewish interest, then they use their media power to label that person an anti-Semite, and that person will be screwed. To be fair, even if China goes on a massive anti-Jewish campaign, the world won’t be able to do much; not only does China have a strong and ever more powerful military, the world is also dependent on China’s markets. At the same time, China has no historical burden towards the Jews and is also not a losing country from WWII, not like Jewish. China’s doing this would only encourage many other countries to do the same, one ought to realize that social norms are dynamics, not static, and its change and evolution stems from a person or organization of sufficient leverage willing to violate some social norm at the time and let others gradually get used to it, thereby rendering it normal, acceptable behavior.

 

A call to boycott Jewish media

A few days ago, on WeChat, somebody sent me the following screenshot,

which just goes to show how egregious censorship really is in America.

So, I have some American friends who I wish to tell some things, but I am hesitant to over Gmail/Facebook, the two most common means of communication in America now, for the reason that I don’t want a permanent record of the information stored within an American institution run by people I have no reason to trust with that information.

This is something I’ve been aware of for quite a long time but have mostly kept to myself. You see, there are guys like Andrey Martyanov who are very much against virtual Jewish control of America, yet ironically, he uses blogspot (which was acquired by Google I believe) to blog and Gmail as his email. If he is so against Zionism, why is he trusting an arguably Zionist institution with his information and communications and thereby indirectly endorsing it? He is a Russian who came to the US in the 90s when there was economic crisis in Russia. Why can’t he use a Russian email instead?

Now, when a Russian from Russia emailed me with a mail.ru email, I felt much more comfortable communicating with him. It feels very different talking with a Russian in Russia. Unlike with a Russian in America, I don’t have to worry that he’s some idiot US loving liberal. Or at the very least, I don’t have to worry that some American boss can extort him or at least influence him into some degree of submission. He’s in Russia where he doesn’t have to give a fuck about a US law that would by default side against him, where there are no US taxes or English as the official language.

Having been in China for a while interacting with almost exclusively locals, I no longer view most Chinese in America as truly Chinese. Especially if they refuse to a Chinese medium of communication like WeChat, especially if they insist on using Gmail or Facebook, both explicitly blacklisted in China. In that case, I will refuse to share any serious information with them. If they insist on trusting Jewish controlled American institutions with their personal information, then they will have to bear its consequences. The longer they persist with this, the less likely their ancestral home country will accept them. They will have then placed their fate into the hands of people who have basically no reason to care about their wellbeing.

Somewhat predictably, some of my friends in America seem reluctant to register a WeChat to communicate with me or with others on there with common views who they might be interested in connecting with. They may be similarly unhappy with much of America right now, in particular its ruling class, but they either do not care enough to do anything at all, don’t know how to go about it, or are afraid to. Yes, venting on Quora and Reddit are options, but experience has told us that being banned from Quora on trumped up charges for writing eloquent answers which displease its VCs is a very real possibility. That has in fact happened to a former top writer with 8500+ followers.

My main message is that if you dislike Silicon Valley or the American Jewish establishment so much, you’re not completely stuck with them. You can get out of America, though it might be difficult, as it requires finding a job in and moving to another country. For as long as you are stuck in America, you don’t have to use Facebook or Gmail either, except when really necessary. For your private personal communications, you can register for and use a non-American email provider or messenger, like WeChat.

As for monitoring by the Chinese government, they absolutely won’t give a damn unless you try to organize some serious anti-China political activity on there. Even if you talk the cliche human rights, communist dictatorship crap on a small scale on there, there’s basically a 100% guarantee that nobody will care. Nobody internal will care enough to go to the trouble to read your messages. In fact, both Tencent and the Chinese government might well be happy to see more internationalization of their product.

By boycotting certain mainstream American internet products, you not only transfer a tad of both data and advertising revenue to whatever else you are using in place. You also send a political message that encourages more people like you to do the same, thereby making it more socially acceptable behavior. Not to mention how through that, you might meet some interesting people who may lead you to some good opportunities, as happened to myself.

I shall conclude by saying that there is little point in fighting from within if your political views are marginal or directly at odds with the American mainstream as societies are naturally top down. In some sense, you cannot achieve anything serious without being part of the mainstream of whatever organization or society you are part of. Yes, go find the minority of people in America who think like you, but in addition to that you are likely to reap a bigger fruit connecting with people outside America, not difficult in today’s internet world. Do what you need to do for minimum survival but past that, the best way to protest is to ignore and detach, not by arguing with or trying to influence people fundamentally opposed to you.

Translation of that Chinese poem on the USSR into English

Original here. My strictly literary translation of it into Russian here.

苏联的伟大千年难遇。

如超新星爆发,短促壮丽,孕育新生。

可比西方历史上的马其顿帝国。

可比东方历史上的秦帝国。

共产革命,击毙纳粹,计划经济,中国工业化原始积累,这是四大苏联伟业。

就如马其顿带来的希腊化和东西方交流,或如秦朝带来的大一统观念,将深远地影响人类千年。

苏联亡了。

自以为是的冷战胜利者狂欢二十年而已。

现在苏联播下的星火已经燎原。

资本主义的癌症,地球的蛊王—中共文明正在冉冉升起。

正如马其顿后的罗马,正如大秦后的大汉。

作者:长寿者
链接:https://www.zhihu.com/question/54976747/answer/453939834
来源:知乎
著作权归作者所有。商业转载请联系作者获得授权,非商业转载请注明出处。

As for its English translation, my remark on that was one of “Overall the translation is quiet good but I don’t think the content will be well received by English readers for obvious political reasons.”

The translator responds, “It’s good if the thing will infuriate some people a bit :), fully agree with you here. It was part of motivation.”

Soviet Union, glory forever is yours,
like the brightest of all supernovas.
Brief was grandeur, but globally impacting was
stalwart vigour before you unknown.
In your time, gave the radiance and power away,
but centupled in following years
all the crops you have sown… in a similar way,
ancient peoples were knelt by the heroes:
for the West, Alexandrian might was your twin,
for the East, ’twas the Qin incarnation.
As the shine of your height, communism was seen;
you exacted an obliteration
on the fiend of Nazism; developed that huge
planned economy, strict, all-embracing;
for industrial China, the impulse were you;
that’s for what I unceasingly praise you.
These four feats of the soul of the Soviets prevail,
all depicting the face of the era.
Twentieth century, put only these on your scales,
not the chaff and the trivia mere.
Like the Great Alexander made Hellenism thrive,
Greeks, Egyptians, Pamirians tying,
like the Qin closed its ranks with its Dynasty’s drive*,
like for fates of the world unifying
was the U.S.S.R. The ingenious surge
of that energy shall not expire.
Husk is shed, soul is free. And the world to emerge
has insights to grow into acquired.
Yes, the Union’s gone. But triumphant in vain
is the self-righteous Cold War victor.
Twenty years flew by… Truth is valued again.
Thought is living, lies cannot constrict it.
It’s full circle: anew is the Union born.
Lit is prairie, the fire’s increasing.
Off is cancerous tumor of capital torn.
For it isn’t without a reason,
having battled this ailment and seen what is true,
own selves we rework, growing finer.
Greeks to Rome, the Qin to the Han, the S.U.
to the People’s Republic of China.

(*Original. Vladimir Beryazev’s line: like did China close ranks under communist drive)

My reaction to this, its very literarily adorned style of translation in particular, is mostly one of laughs.

A pdf of all this.

In Russian,

О, Советский Союз, твоя слава в веках,
Как ярчайшая вспышка сверхновой!
Скоротечно величье, всемирен размах
Той невиданной мощи суровой.

Отсиял и отвластвовал в срок роковой,
Но стократно в обильные годы
Всё взошло, что посеял…
Так древний Герой
На колени повергнул народы –
Македонского властью стал Западу ты.
И державою Цинь – для Востока.
Коммунизм был сияньем твоей высоты.
И тобою разгромлен жестоко
Хищный демон нацизма…
А то громадьё
Экономики строгого плана!
Индустрии Китая начало твоё! –
Вот, что славлю в тебе неустанно.

Те четыре свершенья советской души,
В каждом подвиге – образ эпохи.
Век ХХ – лишь их на весы положи,
Остальное – полова и крохи.

Как во дни Искандера расцвёл эллинизм
От Испании и до Памира,
Так Китай воедино сплотил коммунизм,
Так на судьбы огромного мира
Повлиял СССР. Не иссякнет уже
Той энергии творческий выброс.
Оболочка распалась. Не тесно душе.
И прозрения – мира на вырост.

Да, Союза уж нет!
Но в холодной войне
Победитель ликует напрасно.
20-ть лет миновало… Вновь правда в цене.
Мысль жива, лжи она не подвластна.

Круг замкнулся. Опять возникает Союз –
Искра грезит ковыльным пожаром.
Прочь из раково-алчных и денежных уз,
Ведь не даром, не даром, не даром,
Одолев эту немочь, мы истину зрим –
День за днём из себя вырастая,
Как во след Александру владетельный Рим,
В мир идёт мощь и воля Китая!

 

On the global homo Anglo world order, its origin and its implications

I have a very smart and unusually politically perceptive WASP American friend, who placed at or at least near the top at elite math contests. He once said to me the following:

A world run by Chinese or Japanese is one where they’d be rich and on top but mostly leave others alone, except to get money from them. A world run by whites is one where half want to conquer and half want to help. A world run by Jews is one where they’d systematically extinguish any hope of ending it.

I feel that before he said this, I was still somewhat half asleep on this matter. I was subconsciously aware but perhaps not consciously so. And over time, my understanding of this, the last sentence in particular, grows only more profound. In some sense, what is described there is much already happening.

Like it or not, America is still by far the most powerful or at least the most politically influential country in the world. And since that Jews have already solid control at the highest echelons of the most influential organizations in America, like Goldman-Sachs, like Google, like Harvard, all of which are relentlessly absorbing and influencing people, elites especially, globally to a point of no, or at least, difficult return, one can argue that that above hypothetical scenario is already very much alive.

In the 20th century, America has aimed to bring in and brought in elites from other countries into its system and order much more so than any other big nation. The Soviet Union did to some extent as the pioneer of the socialist system, which it sought to internationalize, but it’s hardly debatable that even during the relative height of the Soviet Union, the level of “Sovietization” of the world was much less so than the Americanization of the world, let alone after its collapse. China is now powerful and increasingly so but its latecomer status and more so its alien culture more or less render impossible direct global political and cultural influence the way that America, and more generally, the Anglo world has done. It is expected that China will become by a wide margin the world’s largest economy, with at the same time indisputably world class science and technology and military, including core innovative ability and capacity, by the end of this century at the latest. But it is hard to imagine a real Sinicization of the world. China is the ancestral homeland of Chinese, unlike America, a new immigrant nation founded on dispossession and white supremacy; mass immigration to China will simply never be allowed. At the same time, Chinese language and culture is too different from that of the rest of the world to spread to the rest of the world, for the same reason that the English language did not spread to China even though the West during the turn of the 19th century, so much more modern and powerful, easily brought China to her knees, with implicit reference to the aftermath of the Boxer Rebellion. It is difficult to foresee anything other than a strong degree of isolation for the Chinese in mainland China, with this extending to East Asians in general, though far more so for the Chinese in mainland China due to the diametrically opposite political ideology in addition to race, language, and culture.

It is reasonable for anyone cynical at the slightest to believe that there were and still powerful political forces in Anglo world seeking to irreversibly absorb China into the Anglo system in an unequivocally subordinate position. This has been achieved with Korea as well as with Japan as part of the post-war arrangement. It was their hope that similar could be done with China. The strategy was and still is to cultivate a significant segment of the Chinese elites and population at large that would act in a way that would inextricably bind China to America in such a way that would extinguish any hope that China seriously challenges America on the world stage. This would secure America’s position as the world’s number one, and as a derivative, secure Jewish world domination.

There appears the pattern that the Jewish elites encourage immigration into America. Again, from the cynic’s perspective, it is a mechanism for transmission of American culture and influence throughout the rest of world that would corrode the ability of competing nations and ideologies to challenge the dominant American one. The Jews have already won America. Even if the immigrants and/or their descendants realize that they will always be subordinate in America to the Jews at the top, they won’t really be able to challenge it under the American system. In America, they cannot form their own armies, and Jews will not pass on real political power to them. Stasis will set in in a virtual caste system in liberal democratic America.

According to a Chinese professor, what Jewish elites fear most are political strongmen, with reference to the recent indefinite extension of Xi Jinping’s tenure. In a democratic society, when the president or chairman or whoever changes every few or several years, Jews won’t give a damn about you at all, because your political foundation is very weak. They fear more political strongmen in the likes of Hitler, in the likes of Putin, who would have the ability to disrupt many Jewish plans.

Democracy really is a form of political mediocrity, permitting nothing too extreme. It is at worst very ineffectual or disastrous in the case of 90s Russia and at best unable to achieve anything spectacular. In a dictatorship with a strong ideological basis, the worst is Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan (both of which were of objectively very formidable competence) or maybe Pol Pot (of a very different nature) and the best were USSR before decline and PRC China which achieved miracles and were both extremely successful. Of course, there are plenty of relatively mediocre and bland minor “dictatorships” out of there who most people could not care about. The point is that dictatorship of a certain form is the most conducive to strong ideology, conviction, organization, and efficiency, and thus radical political change in a naturally top down human society. This requires time and thus the importance of long tenure of at least 10 years of a political strongman with a clear direction. It is like how someone who stays and focuses on the same field or job for 10 years generally achieves much more than an unfocused job hopper.

As already mentioned, concomitant with liberal democracy in the Anglo world is support or at least tolerance for racial and cultural diversity in the sense of having people of diverse racial and cultural backgrounds sharing the same land, and as a consequence of which, some degree of miscegenation. Ironically, its inevitable cultural de-heterogenization per spread of the Anglo language and culture to other races actually much reduces global genetic and cultural variance. In doing so, it does poison the Anglo culture itself to some extent but even more so, it is a form of global cultural and political monopoly by a system that the Jews have already won. What is going on here is already in effect systematic extinguishing of the hope of ending a world largely run by Jews. It is the bringing about of an ever more irreversible mediocrity fundamentally motivated by the desire for a closed, entrenched elite to consolidate power that can be likened to cultural and political sterilization of the other to eliminate her potency.

In summary, along this line of argument, the Zionists are already engaged in a process of what is fundamentally a perversion or destruction of civilization to ensure that their rule persists indefinitely. To them, forces still independent from the Anglo liberal democratic system they control, mostly China and Russia, need to sterilized and decapacitated at all costs, with the ends justifying the means. That means whatever “dictators” associated with the two ought to be slandered beyond proportion. That means that even though the Soviet Union much saved the world from a Holocaust perpetrating Nazism, its decisive contribution for the WWII allied victory ought to be erased from the history books, with credit transferred to the American, now proxy for Israel, side.

Andrey Martyanov on Unz Review has written the following.

There is Russian Left and Chinese Left and they look completely different next to Western Left. But we may move even further–so called Western Left is not really Left, it is a brand assigned to it by people who practice faux-scholarship. Reality and a driving force of the Western Left is not so much Marxism, to which this W.Left appeals when it suites it, but still good ol’ liberalism. Western Left is a pinnacle of liberalism, it is its final form which atomized society utterly and in doing so undermined its foundation. The United States was a perfect nation to do so, it is the same as it is a perfect nation, as an example, for organizing Holocaust industry and selling it as a guilt medicine and use it as a coercion tool, the practice also imposed on war-torn Europe by its alleged “liberators”. It is also a perfect country to subvert its foreign and defense policies because the United States doesn’t know what REAL war is. Even rabid Russophobe Richard Pipes openly admitted it. In the end, United States never formed as a true nation. In many respects popular American 20th “history” of Russia is so consistently associated with “Jewishness” (apart from obvious ignorance of those who write it) because it is projection of own complex of inferiority. Russia changed Jews, Jews changed the United States and this inequality will exist and this is one which bothers greatly many of those WASPies in the US who have to face the fact that Russia didn’t sell out to Jews, while the United States today is effectively run by them in key sectors of national activity. This Russia-USSR-Bolsheviks-Jews-GULAG mantra is needed as a therapy for very many Americans in order to block out how they, and others, sold out their country to these very same Jews. Especially against the background of once great country literally turning into the third world multicultural cloaca with grim or no prospects at all. Sad, especially when one looks at purely American phenomenon of a vast strata of Christian Zionists loyal to Israel–an exhibit A of America’s failure to form as a cohesive nation.

Here, what he is essentially saying that Anglos are culturally such a weak people that Jews managed to take over the media, culture, and politics of America from the WASPs despite being outnumbered at least 10 to 1. On the other hand, Russia changed Jews and kept them fundamentally in line with Russian interests despite that the Jewish population percentage in Russia was so much higher. The Chinese are arguably viewed by the Zionists are much more of a threat due to the alienness of Chinese culture in addition to their competence. It would simply be impossible for the Jewish parasite to blend in among the Chinese and thus, she can be there a parasite not. Essentially, the Jewish strategy was to prey on the weak and vulnerable Anglo culture and once they successfully took over that host society abundant in power and resources, they are leveraging it to infect other powerful societies much culturally stronger with the hope of sinking them too into the oblivion of the global homo Anglo world order.

Again, there is no way that Jewish domination of America can be removed from within. Even if the truth is realized, those against it but already submerged into the American system can do nothing in effect to change it, as Jewish seizure of the highest echelons of power in what has already been transformed into a multicultural democracy has rendered organization and instigation of an internal revolution impossible. So if it is to change, it must come from without. If it is to change, this host society must be such that its internal order and prolificness is exhausted enough that it disintegrates and collapses from within. Along then will die the parasite that can live not without its host.

 

一个代表性C++代码例子

C++我好久没碰了,不过因为要面试,不得不复习一下。我个人没那么聪明,C++高超的语言啊,跟Java不一样,好久不碰叫我不查资料在纸上写涉及到他的高层功能的程序或许还真有点够呛,不像我的一个才华出众的朋友,是StackOverflow的C++ top writer,能把C++的非trivial的功能细节讲得滚瓜烂熟,其包括C++ 11里的移动语义,那些我出于好奇以前也自己学过。相反呢,Java是个相对傻逼的语言,几乎涉及不到任何非算法的核心计算机科学观念,所以算法之外感觉也没啥好考的,我也很容易就通过了Java的面试,因为问的都是不涉及到语言细节的很简单的算法题。

C++呢,我觉得一个人如果对编程语言设计和编译器有兴趣,C++的某些高级功能却是好的出发点。比较简单的例子就是他的内存分配是需要手动的,而且与C底层不一样的是,他不是一个简单的free,他的类还都有解构函数,为了在任意该类对象生命期结束时释放为了存他的属性释放的内存及做一些其他与对象解构相关的操作,如记录。这种有一定技术含量的高级功能有一大堆,如指向,拷贝构建函数,移动构建函数,运算符重载,赋值运算符,虚拟函数,模板,等等。

虽然这些语言工程非常丰富并有一定难度,C++语言我也看到不少负面的评论,主要是用它开发的速度太慢,难读维持成本高,这种运行速度能优化到极限并富有这种高级功能的语言的用武之地实在太少,一些需要运行速度优化的函数库用它还好,但是一般情况下真是没有什么意义,真正遇到运行速度瓶颈(现在这种情况是愈来愈少了),把程序的少数关键逻辑以C++写就可以了,而且与C相比,那些高级功能的帮助也并不一定太大。所以那些高超的功能或许看着很牛逼,但是对程序员所提供的或许远远低于程序更加复杂所产生的开发和维持成本。

更详细解释C++的弊端可以看看那个人给我发的https://yosefk.com/c++fqa/defective.html。对于中国学计算机的人的C++狂,他只觉得很受误导。怎么说呢,自己把他看成一种intellectual masturbation吧,我的上所提到的那位人C++百科全书的朋友却有一次对我说他想过写一个C++的编译器玩一玩,只不过要花10年的全职时间。

好吧,我们下面就少扯C++语言了,先看看它的我从CSDN找到的一块代码,分析一下。

#include
#include
 
using namespace std;
 
class CMyString
{
public:
	CMyString(const char* pData = nullptr);
	CMyString(const CMyString& str);
	~CMyString(void);
 
	CMyString& operator = (const CMyString& str);
 
	void Print();
 
private:
	char* m_pData;
};
 
CMyString::CMyString(const  char *pData)
{
	if (pData == nullptr)
	{
		m_pData = new char[1];
		m_pData[0] = '\0';
	}
	else
	{
		int length = strlen(pData);
		m_pData = new char[length + 1];
		strcpy_s(m_pData,length+1, pData);
	}
}
 
CMyString::CMyString(const CMyString &str)
{
	int length = strlen(str.m_pData);
	m_pData = new char[length + 1];
	strcpy_s(m_pData,length+1, str.m_pData);
}
 
CMyString::~CMyString()
{
	delete[] m_pData;
}
 
CMyString& CMyString::operator = (const CMyString& str)
{
	if (&str != this)
	{
		CMyString strTemp(str);
		char* pTemp = strTemp.m_pData;
		strTemp.m_pData = m_pData;
		m_pData = pTemp;
	}
 
	return *this;
}

———————

作者:Alatebloomer
来源:CSDN
原文:https://blog.csdn.net/alatebloomer/article/details/80308482
版权声明:本文为博主原创文章,转载请附上博文链接!

构建函数很简单,没啥好说的,与此对偶的解构函数也一样。

拷贝构建函数也就是在堆内存里分配足够多内存并复制至之参数里的串(以字符指针表示)。

最tricky的是赋值运算符。第一,因为这是赋值,左值已被构建,则有赋值自直该不了了之的“边界情况”,而为此,我们简单用一个if条件。在它里面,由于串长度不是固定的,所以不能直接复制。反而,我们要在堆内存新建一个字符指针,复制右值串字符,然后把左值的字符指针属性赋值为它。同时,我们需要垃圾回收旧指针,为此,我们利用C++对象离开作用域时解构函数被调用。由于在CMyString对象构建在if里,离开if时它的解构函数被调用,那我们就把老的指针交换到那儿。我个人发觉到还可以做一点小简化,那就是

char* pTemp = strTemp.m_pData;
strTemp.m_pData = m_pData;
m_pData = pTemp;

改为

swap(m_pData, strTemp.m_pData);

使该代码之作用变得即更明确又更简化。

其实,刚才这些也都挺弱智的,没啥难的,但是还是得小心一点。加上,C++的句法也复杂一点,尤其在涉及到这些面对对象功能的情况下,所以我说面试还是准备一下最好吗。

好,今天应该就到此结束,若我有时间又足够感兴趣,或许我会对一对关于C++ 11新加的移动语义,包括什么shared_ptr,的中文资料复习一下并自己写一写,在巩固自己的C++知识的同时,又能学到一些新的有意思的中文计算机术语,也提高我自己几乎没有经过任何正式训练的中文写作能力。

My first on-site software interview in China

Last night, speaking with my headhunter, I was pleasantly surprised to hear that in China, the tech hiring process is usually just one 2 hour on-site. If you pass, you’re hired after that. Maybe in a big company if they really like talking with you, they’ll continue to talk with you overtime and it might last 4 hours. This is in stark contrast to what I’ve experienced in America. They almost always have at least one phone screen that lasts 45-60 min. Sometimes, there are two. Sometimes, there is a code test too. The worst on-site I’ve had is the LinkedIn one that started at 10 am and ended at 5 pm with a one hour lunch interview where you are still judged and evaluated. There are basically no breaks in between. It’s exhausting and quite a waste of time for both sides in my opinion (there’s, I guess, the aspect of testing stamina and social polish as an artificial method of selection, but really, wouldn’t the time be better spent into doing actual work or resting). I personally think that an excess of time and energy spent on selection and social proof via rather artificial channels is quite detrimental not only for productivity but for the overall culture. I must say that the Chinese internet industry is smart not to do the same bloated hiring process of code test plus phone interview plus full day on-site interview, they were smarter than I actually expected, as I was quite surprised to learn this.

To explain this, that headhunter said that the Chinese tech companies value efficiency. I thought of this more as “trust.” More like, they trust that you’re not a bozo and by default, they trust that you are competent and well-intentioned and they don’t go out of their way to screen that you are through a long and rather flawed process. When I mentioned this, he said, yes, and more specifically, that Northern Chinese tend to be high in mutual trust and also very direct in communication with each other. This conforms to what this AG guy on Disqus has written Steve Hsu’s blog from what I remember. I am of Northern Chinese descent too by the way. That guy said that as Northerners with limited contact with Southern Chinese we might not really realize this.

As for this first (in China) on-site software interview, it was with a consumer technology company with already over 10 million users. It was for a backend developer position. The interview with basically three rounds (of like 40 minutes each) of talk about resume/experience plus some algorithmic coding questions. Those algorithm questions were super trivial (at least for me). They were about the level of difficulty of the questions asked by big internet/software companies in America. Honestly, they are questions that a smart high schooler who did those algorithmic programming contests could easily answer. But we all know that real software engineering has little to do with that, the challenge is more with the design and scale of codebase and ambiguity and business/products requirements. I asked one of the interviewers how many machines there are for their MySQL data, and he said only 4, which sounds about right. As for scalability, in most cases it is not really a problem in this industry. A single Apache/Nginx instance can handle 10,000 concurrent connections and usually over 1000 requests per second. See, though they have over 10 million registered accounts, in practice, for this type of internet service, the average user is actively making requests only for a very small fraction of time (certainly less than 1% and usually under 0.1% to be fair). In other words, requests per user over time are very sparsely distributed. So just a few instances of the same web service would be sufficient.

Afterwards I talked with this software engineer about the tech industry in America, in particular the long interviews, the high turnover, and the short average job tenure. We both think that this is rather inefficient and bad for morale. Long interviews means the ratio of time spent both interviewing for jobs and interviewing candidates to actually doing meaningful work is much higher. High turnover and short average job tenure means not only more of the already long interviews but also much more time spent on acquainting with and setting up development environments and tools and frameworks and learning/reviewing new material as opposed to actually doing meaningful work. That guy claims that in American corporate culture, the default is high mutual distrust, with interviews being a method of probing candidates and pressuring them to reveal embarrassing information about themselves or lose their social polish out of exhaustion. I do feel perhaps such negative views of his on American culture are rather extreme and perhaps somewhat unwarranted, but maybe a detailed writeup by him of all that he’s said to me on those matters would convince me otherwise.

著名朗诵艺术家殷之光朗诵毛主席的水调歌头·重上井冈山

我之前从未听说过殷之光,直到最近在四川绵阳某一个活动的音乐朗诵会才得知这人,也与他合照了一下。他现在已经84岁高龄了,但还在朗诵表演,这次是特意把他从北京飞到绵阳的。他的朗诵给了我一种强大力量的感觉,充分把那首诗的气魄表达了出来。这种专业配音乐的现场朗诵我还真没有看过,对我还算很新鲜的东西,加上那首诗我在看的时候也一点不熟悉。

水调歌头·重上井冈山
毛泽东
久有凌云志,
重上井冈山。
千里来寻故地,
旧貌变新颜。
到处莺歌燕舞,
更有潺潺流水,
高路入云端。
过了黄洋界,
险处不须看。
风雷动,
旌旗奋,
是人寰。
三十八年过去,
弹指一挥间。
可上九天揽月,
可下五洋捉鳖,
谈笑凯歌还。
世上无难事,
只要肯登攀。

我把他的朗诵表演也摄像了,在这儿分享一下。

For those of you who do not read Chinese, here is an English translation of the poem.

I have long aspired to reach for the clouds
And I again ascend Chingkangshan.
Coming from afar to view our old haunt, I find new scenes replacing the old.
Everywhere orioles sing, swallows dart,
Streams babble
And the road mounts skyward.
Once Huangyangchieh is passed
No other perilous place calls for a glance.
Wind and thunder are stirring,
Flags and banners are flying
Wherever men live.
Thirty-eight years are fled
With a mere snap of the fingers.
We can clasp the moon in the Ninth Heaven
And seize turtles deep down in the Five Seas:
We’ll return amid triumphant song and laughter.
Nothing is hard in this world
If you dare to scale the heights.

which I pulled directly from https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/poems/poems35.htm.

As far as this type of political poetry is concerned, I had actually translated strictly literally a Chinese poem on the historical place of the USSR from an answer on Zhihu to Russian, and after advertising it just a bit, there are Russians translating it into much better Russian and even literary English which I have not bothered to seriously read. I thought some Russians might find this interesting too, having in mind a Russian guy I know around my age who also came to the US at a young age, who also finds various aspects of America utterly ridiculous. That can well illustrated by the following anecdote.

So I had some sweatshirt that was basically a big “United States of America” and the Flag on it that was not bought by me that I basically never wore outside for my own sanity. But once when that friend of mine was leaving, I wore it outside to troll him. He completely cracked up, and subsequently, I took off the sweatshirt and threw it at him, and ensued a bit of “hot potato” with that sweatshirt.

Readers of this blog might have realized by now that I have a rather “unusual” sense of humor. Partly, as written in my last blog post, I find much of American politics a mass play of feigned (or not) stupidity, and I can’t help but to make fun of this idiocy a bit on this very blog for my own entertainment, and also for the inspiration of many closeted who feel the same but have not yet “come out.”

Finally, a brief search on Yandex was not able to find for me a Russian translation of that poem; maybe some Russian can find that for me, and then I can add that here too.