Some AnonFromTN quotes

周日有空稍微看看Unz(好久没看了),并收集一下有意思的评论


@AP

It is possible (although the probability of this is low) that Omeljan just honest idiot (which honestly believes in Ukrainian hyperloop and Ukrainian flag in Vladivostok)

Hyperloop signed the agreement also. Are they, too, idiots?Here is the hyperloop founder and CEO who signed it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirk_Ahlborn

Idiot?

Ukrainian flag over Vladivostok wasn’t how you said it was:

https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/5d60c0199a79476a49cb221e

(link to his facebook):

“А так ми привітали сьогодні з Днем Прапора і Днем Незалежності, що надходить завтра, українців на центральній площі окупованої Горлівки.

Синьо-жовті листівки доставляємо поки не Укрпоштою 😉

Європа буде від Лісабону до Владивостока, коли український прапор повернеться у Владивосток!”

Translation of relevant part:

“Europe will be from Lisbon to Vladivostok, when the Ukrainian flag will return to Vladivostok.”

No mention of a victorious war and conquest of Russia. Logical interpretation is that Russia will one day join the EU and Ukrainians will be free to fly their flag to the ends of Russia.

As usual, you are clueless and gullible, believing and spreading nonsense about Ukraine.

This means that the clinical idiot was appointed Minister in order to create the best conditions for stealing by other people.

Or it just means another manifestation of your cluelessness about Ukraine. Nothing new.

“Clinical idiot,” meanwhile, was the most successful transport minister that Ukraine has had.

Logical interpretation is that Russia will one day join the EU

With this kind of logic people are best advised to see their psychiatrist (a real one, not a shrink or some other quack).

The last few years were a turning point in Russian psyche. Finally, the people realized that Russia is an independent civilization, neither Europe, nor Asia. The majority stopped looking to Europe as an example of something positive. It is mostly considered an example of what not to do.

Russia will never join the EU for a number of reasons. First, there would be a question of who is joining whom. Just look at the map: Europe is a pimple on a huge body of Asia, like India or Indochina, less populous that the former and more populous than the latter. European delusions of grandeur are coming to a bitter end. Second, the EU bureaucrats would never agree to that: their habitual US boot-licking would be over, and that’s the gist of their jobs. To get a “leadership” position in the EU, you have to pathetically loose the elections in your own country (current examples: Tusk, Juncker, Ursula von der Leyen). Third, the EU is in no mood to expand, as with accumulated problems it is a lot more likely to fall apart.

Finally, Ukraine has no more chances of joining the EU than Burkina Faso or Republic of Palau. So, the likelihood of Ukrainian flag over Vladivostok is about the same as of that flag over the Moon, Mars, or Venus. Or the likelihood that Down Syndrome sufferers would change the colors of their flag out of respect for Ukraine. Sweet dreams!


Mongols (as well as Yakuts and Buryats) have very narrow eyes and wide face, whereas most Kazakhs (especially their prettiest girls) have much larger eyes and the face of more European proportions. What’s more, Kazakh nose is quite prominent, in sharp contrast to Mongols with tiny nose. I don’t know the data of any genetic studies, but facial features suggest a large proportion of Caucasian blood in present-day Kazakhs, at least in civilized city dwellers.


@Staudegger

It’s always funny when Russians claim that Ukraine, which is racially and culturally-homogeneous and whose history dates back to the time before Moscow was founded, is somehow not a “real” country, unlike glorious Mother Russia, which contains dozens of different races and cultures, a feeble economy smaller than Brazil’s, cities of rotting communist architecture, and capital full of Muslims who worship at the biggest mosque in Europe; a Zionist mafia state whose bogus patriotism is based on Stalin worship and recycled WW2 propaganda. If Ukraine is a fake country, Russia is even faker.
Maybe on your planet Ukraine is homogeneous. Here on Earth it is incredibly heterogeneous. There is Eastern and Southern Ukraine, speaking mostly Russian and Surgik (a crazy mix of Russian and Central Ukrainian), there is quite different Slobozhanschina (Kharkov region) speaking almost pure Russian, there is Central Ukraine (Poltava and nearby regions) speaking (at least in villages) what became literary Ukrainian, there is Odessa and areas around it, speaking Russian, with a sprinkling of Romanian and Bulgarian, there is Volhynia and Galicia, speaking a variety of Polonized or Germanized dialects, there is Trans-Carpathian region, where people hate Galicians even more fiercely than Russians do, and where there are sizable Hungarian and Romanian populations speaking their own languages. I am not even counting Crimea that never was Ukrainian and never will be.
Tell us more about your planet, I am curious.


@Beckow

As to the West, you have to distinguish the Empire and the EU. The Empire is as far from Ukraine as it is from Afghanistan, Iraq, Lybia, Syria, or Serbia. So, from the imperial perspective, there is no harm in leaving a pile of shit to inconvenience others, as long as it’s very far from your own door. Besides, I strongly suspect that the Empire wanted to kill two birds with one stone: hurt both Russia and the EU. It achieved both goals. The EU is another story. It’s “leadership” (basically, pathetic imperial puppets) has been acting against best interests of Europeans for a long time now. Europe lost a lot, and got a huge problem right on its doorstep. So, if saner people come to power in Europe (unlikely, but possible), they would see that cooperation with Russia in the cleanup is in the best interests of the EU. Otherwise, Ukraine will fester for decades, stinking out both Russia and Europeans, with the Empire smugly far away.


@Beckow

From Western point of view, Ukie provocation was not a complete failure (even though it’s a catastrophic failure from Ukrainian point of view): Russia had to spend a lot to develop the production of military things it used to import from Ukraine, like ships, ship engines, helicopter engines, spaceship control systems, etc. Now that it acquired the capability to produce these things, there will be no going back regardless who rules Ukraine: it’s industries that used to export to Russia are doomed. These include such giants as Nikolaev shipbuilding plant, Motor Sich in Zaparozie, Antonov aircraft building plant in Kiev, etc. The same goes for transit. It is not just natural gas transit everybody talks about. Russia used to transport ammonia to Odessa, where it was partially exported and partially converted into fertilizers. The plant that used to do that is dead. Ukraine tried to sell it for $5 billion under Yanuk and got no takers, about a year ago it tried to sell it for 10% of that price, and got no takers again. There also used to be substantial Russian payments for transport via the railway going across Eastern Ukraine. Russia built an alternative bypassing Ukraine, so they might as well dismantle the rails on their route. For Ukraine these are all irreversible losses, but from Western perspective, these are little victories: Russia was forced to spend more. As the West does not give a hoot about Ukraine, the US and its vassals can freely celebrate these victories.

So, it all depends on the point of view. The West never cared about aborigines, so their point of view does not come into its calculations.


@Rurik

That’s one explanation. Smacks of paranoia, though

I just wrote a comment that included the fate of the Kulaks.

Or consider the Palestinians in 1947, I wonder if some of them were called ‘paranoid’ too?

Or David Koresh or Randy and Vicky Weaver. They too felt they understood the nature of their enemies, and no doubt many called them paranoid.

Thing is, not all mega-thieves that robbed Russia in the 1990s and are robbing Russia (less blatantly under Putin, but still robbing), the US and Europeans now are Jews.

Of course not. But were it not for Jewish supremacists, (exactly as Churchill pointed out) utterly in control of Russia after the revolution, then the Red Terror would never have been.

All you have to do is look around today. Look at all the wars and suffering and destroyed nations, millions of people murdered and maimed and displaced, and all of it a direct consequence of Jewish supremacist$ in total control of the governments of ZUS, England, France, Germany, Belgium, Canada, Sweden, and so on..

Most of the “Russian” oligarchs were agents of Rothschild.

Some are even Muslims.

How much success would Muslims be having with their incursions into the West were it not for the corrosive cultural and spiritual poisons emanating out of the West’s ((media)), and corrupted governments and courts and other institutions, eh?

Just consider the troubles created in Chechnya by John McCain and his ((neocon)) buddies. (the same people who created the deadly strife in Georgia and Ukraine).

How many acts of terror or financial rapine would Muslims be committing in the West were it not for the (((demand))) that Europe open its gates to unlimited invasions from the Third World?

You make some valid points, but I think you are oversimplifying it. You are conflating two different things.

Yes, most of the wars the US waged in the last 50 years were for Israel’s benefit. Most of these wars were actually detrimental for the US national interests. Yes, most mega-thieves stealing USSR state assets in the 1990s, both foreign and domestic, were Jewish. Most, but not all. The same is true for the US and Europe. Personally, I don’t care which of them is Jewish and which is not: they are all thieves and should be in jail or, better yet, should be hanged on lampposts. That applies to Saudi, Ukrainian, and Georgian oligarchs. Say, the fact that Akhmetov in Ukraine is Tatar, as well as Usmanov in Russia, should not protect them from gallows, where they should hang next to their Jewish “colleagues”.


Advertisements